BACKGROUND. Clinical use of the dual-energy CT (DECT) iodine quantification technique is hindered by between-platform (i.e., across different manufacturers) variability in iodine concentration (IC) values, particularly at low iodine levels. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop in an anthropomorphic phantom a method for reducing between-platform variability in quantification of low iodine content levels using DECT and to evaluate the method's performance in patients undergoing serial clinical DECT examinations on different platforms. METHODS. An anthropomorphic phantom in three body sizes, incorporating varied lesion types and scanning conditions, was imaged with three distinct DECT implementations from different manufacturers at varying radiation exposures. A cross-platform iodine quantification model for correcting between-platform variability at low iodine content was developed using the phantom data. The model was tested in a retrospective series of 30 patients (20 men, 10 women; median age, 62 years) who each underwent three serial contrast-enhanced DECT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis (90 scans total) for routine oncology surveillance using the same three DECT platforms as in the phantom. Estimated accuracy of phantom IC values was summarized using root-mean-square error (RMSE) relative to known IC. Between-platform variability in patients was summarized using root-mean-square deviation (RMSD). RMSE and RMSD were compared between platform-based IC (ICPB) and cross-platform IC (ICCP). ICPB was normalized to aorta and portal vein. RESULTS. In the phantom study, mean RMSE of ICPB across platforms and other experimental conditions was 0.65 ± 0.18 mg I/mL compared with 0.40 ± 0.08 mg I/mL for ICCP (38% decrease in mean RMSE; p < .05). Intrapatient between-platform variability across serial DECT examinations was higher for ICPB than ICCP (RMSD, 97% vs 88%; p < .001). Between-platform variability was not reduced by normalization of ICPB to aorta (RMSD, 97% vs 101%; p = .12) or portal vein (RMSD, 97% vs 97%; p = .81). CONCLUSION. The developed cross-platform method significantly decreased between-platform variability occurring at low iodine content with platform-based DECT iodine quantification. CLINICAL IMPACT. With further validation, the cross-platform method, which has been implemented as a web-based app, may expand clinical use of DECT iodine quantification, yielding meaningful IC values that reflect tissue biologic viability or treatment response in patients who undergo serial examinations on different platforms.
Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; dual-energy CT; iodine quantification; platform; variability.