Reprocessing of loaned surgical instruments/implants in Australia and Brazil: A survey of those at the coalface

Abstract

Background: Acquisition of surgical instruments (SI) and implants by loaner system is a worldwide practice. Although quality of device reprocessing has been reported to be lower in low and middle-income countries compared with higher income countries, few investigations have been conducted on the management and reprocessing of loaned devices. Thus, in this study we evaluate the practices of management and reprocessing of loaner SI and non-sterile implants (NSI) in a high (Australia) and a middle-income (Brazil) country.

Methods: Cross-sectional surveys (hardcopy or online form) was self-administered by sterilising service unit's personnel of Brazilian and Australian hospitals. Only those units that sourced orthopaedic surgical instruments and non-sterile loaned implants from independent companies were eligible.

Results: A total of 65 questionnaires from Australia and 168 from Brazil were analysed. Quality indicators regarding structure and work process for the management and reprocessing of loaned SI and NSI was of a higher standard in Australia than in Brazil. However, failures were detected in both countries, for instance delivery delays and improper point-of-use pre-cleaning practices.

Conclusion: There are key challenges inherent of the multifaceted reusable medical devices loaner system in both countries, such as communication failures, implementation of non-recommended practices, reprocessing of NSI, and other related to structure and process quality indicators, that must be faced. Initial and ongoing education and training should be provided and should embrace the themes of technical proficiency, effective communication and teamwork, and should include all personnel involved in this process, even loaner company staff.

Keywords: Health care; Implants and prostheses; Quality indicators; Sterilization; Surgical instruments.