Comparative Analysis of Genome Editors Efficiency on a Model of Mice Zygotes Microinjection

Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 23;22(19):10221. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910221.

Abstract

Genome editing is an indispensable tool for functional genomics. The caveat of the genome-editing pipeline is a prevalence of error-prone non-homologous end joining over homologous recombination, while only the latter is suitable to introduce particularly desired genetic variants. To overcome this problem, a toolbox of genome engineering was appended by a variety of improved instruments. In this work, we compared the efficiency of a number of recently suggested improved systems for genome editing applied to the same genome regions on a murine zygote model via microinjection. As a result, we observed that homologous recombination utilizing an ssDNA template following sgRNA directed Cas9 cleavage is still the method of choice for the creation of animals with precise genome alterations.

Keywords: CRISPR Cas9; genome editing; homologous recombination; knockout mice; microinjection; prime editor.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • DNA End-Joining Repair
  • DNA, Single-Stranded
  • Gene Editing / methods*
  • Homologous Recombination
  • Mice
  • Microinjections / methods
  • Models, Animal
  • RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • Zygote / metabolism*

Substances

  • DNA, Single-Stranded
  • RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems