Femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification

Max Jaenisch; Hendrik Kohlhof; Adnan Kasapovic; Martin Gathen; Thomas Martin Randau; Koroush Kabir; Philip Peter Roessler; Geert Pagenstert; Dieter Christian Wirtz

doi:10.1007/s00402-021-04201-7

Femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1163-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04201-7. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. max.jaenisch@ukbonn.de.
² Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
³ CLARAHOF Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Basel, Clarahofweg 19a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.

^# Contributed equally.

Abstract

Introduction: The complex field of femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty displays a lack of standardized, intuitive pre- and intraoperative assessment. To address this issue, the femoral defect classification (FDC) is introduced to offer a reliable, reproducible and an intuitive classification system with a clear therapeutic guideline.

Materials and methods: The FDC is based on the integrity of the main femoral segments which determine function and structural support. It focuses on the femoral neck, the metaphysis consisting of the greater and lesser trochanter, and the femoral diaphysis. The four main categories determine the location of the defect while subcategories a, b and c are being used to classify the extent of damage in each location. In total, 218 preoperative radiographs were retrospectively graded according to FDC and compared to intraoperatively encountered bone defects. To account for inter-rater and intra-rater agreement, 5 different observers evaluated 80 randomized cases at different points in time.

Results: A Cohens kappa of 0.832 ± 0.028 could be evaluated, accounting for excellent agreement between preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings. To account for inter-rater reliability, 80 patients have been evaluated by 5 different observers. Testing for inter-rater reliability, a Fleiss Kappa of 0.688 could be evaluated falling into the good agreement range. When testing for intra-rater reliability, Cohens Kappa of each of the 5 raters has been analyzed and the mean was evaluated at 0.856 accounting for excellent agreement.

Conclusion: The FDC is a reliable and reproducible classification system. It combines intuitive use and structured design and allows for consistent preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. A therapeutic algorithm has been created according to current literature and expert opinion. Due to the combination of the FDC with the recently introduced Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) a structured approach to the entire field of hip revision arthroplasty is now available.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Bone defect; Femoral; Hip; Revision.

MeSH terms

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
Femur / surgery
Hip Prosthesis*
Humans
Radiography
Reoperation
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies