Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance

K Appelt; M Takes; C J Zech; K A Blackham; T Schubert

doi:10.1186/s42155-021-00262-2

Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance

CVIR Endovasc. 2021 Oct 11;4(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00262-2.

Authors

K Appelt^#¹, M Takes^#², C J Zech², K A Blackham², T Schubert^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Clinic, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Konrad.appelt@usb.ch.
² Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Clinic, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
³ Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

^# Contributed equally.

Abstract

Purpose: The current literature on the use of brachial artery access is controversial. Some studies found increased puncture site complications. Others found no higher complication rates than in patients with femoral or radial access. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ultrasound (US)-guidance on access site complications.

Materials and methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of all consecutive patients with brachial arterial access for interventional procedures. Complications were classified into minor complications (conservative treatment only) and major complications (requiring surgical intervention). The brachial artery was cannulated in the antecubital fossa under US-guidance. After the intervention, manual compression or closure devices, both followed by a compression bandage for 3 h, either achieved hemostasis.

Results: Seventy-five procedures in seventy-one patients were performed in the study period using brachial access. Access was successful in all cases (100%). Procedures in different vascular territories were performed: neurovascular (10/13.5%), upper extremity (32/43.2%), visceral (20/27.0%), and lower extremity (12/16.3%). Sheath size ranged from 3.2F to 8F (mean: 5F). Closure devices were used in 17 cases (22.7%). In total, six complications were observed (8.0%), four minor complications (5.3%, mostly puncture site hematomas), and two major complications, that needed surgical treatment (2.7%). No brachial artery thrombosis or upper extremity ischemia occurred.

Conclusion: Exclusive use of US-guidance resulted in a low risk of brachial artery access site complications in our study compared to the literature. US-guidance has been proven to reduce the risk of access site complications in several studies in femoral access. In addition, brachial artery access yields a high technical success rate and requires no additional injection of spasmolytic medication. Sheath size was the single significant predictor for complications.

Keywords: Angiography; Brachial access; Endovascular; Intervention; Ultrasound; Ultrasound-guidance.