Nursing Home Versus Community Resuscitation After Cardiac Arrest: Comparative Outcomes and Risk Factors

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1316-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who experienced cardiac arrest in nursing homes compared with those in private residences and determine prognostic factors for survival.

Design: This was a retrospective study that analyzed data from an Utstein-style registry of the Tokyo Fire Department.

Setting and participants: We identified patients aged ≥65 years who experienced cardiac arrest in a nursing home or private residence from the population-based registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Tokyo, Japan, from 2014 to 2018.

Methods: Patients were grouped into the nursing home or the private residence groups according to their cardiac arrest location. We compared the characteristics and outcomes between the 2 groups and determined prognostic factors for survival in the nursing home group. The primary outcome was 1-month survival after cardiac arrest.

Results: In total, 37,550 patient records (nursing home group = 6271; private residence group = 31,279) were analyzed. Patients in the nursing home group were significantly older and more often had witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and shock delivery using an automated external defibrillator. The 1-month survival rate was significantly higher in the nursing home group (2.6% vs 1.8%, P < .001). In the best scenario (daytime emergency call, witnessed cardiac arrest, bystander CPR provided), the 1-month survival rate after cardiac arrest in the nursing home group was 8.0% (95% confidence interval 6.4-9.9%), while none survived if they had neither witness nor bystander CPR.

Conclusions and implications: Survival outcome was significantly better in the nursing home group than in the private residence group and was well stratified by 3 prognostic factors: emergency call timing, witnessed status, and bystander CPR provision. Our results suggest that a decision to withhold vigorous treatment solely based on nursing home residential status is not justified, while termination of resuscitation may be determined by considering significant prognostic factors.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; nursing homes; older adults; private residence; prognosis; survival.

MeSH terms

  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*
  • Emergency Medical Services*
  • Humans
  • Nursing Homes
  • Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest* / therapy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors