Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative management protocol used to accelerate patient recovery. This study evaluated its benefits in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study compared patients before (January 2013 to December 2016) and after (June 2018 to December 2020) ERAS protocol implementation in our hospital. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare short-term surgical outcomes between ERAS and non-ERAS groups. After propensity score matching each group included 243 patients.
Results: There were significant differences in hospital length of stay after surgery (7.40 vs 11.17 days, P < .001) and hospitalization cost (¥69380 vs ¥78075, P < .001) between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The time to chest tube removal (4.91 vs 7.16 days, P < .001) and first bowel movement (2.87 vs 3.97 days, P < .001) was significantly shorter in the ERAS group. However there was no significant difference in total postoperative complication morbidity (20.2% vs 25.1%, P = .193). The complication of postoperative atelectasis or pneumonia was significantly lower in the ERAS group (P = .003), but there was no significant difference in occurrence of at least grade III complications between the 2 groups (12.3% vs 11.5%, P = .889).
Conclusions: We demonstrated that ERAS could reduce hospital stay, numerical pain scores, and hospitalization costs without increasing postoperative complication and readmission. Furthermore subgroup analyses revealed that ERAS was safe for older people (>70 years old).
Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.