Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative study from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation

Claudio Di Lorito; Tahir Masud; John Gladman; Maureen Godfrey; Marianne Dunlop; Alessandro Bosco; Rowan H Harwood

doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02451-z

Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative study from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation

BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02451-z.

Authors

Claudio Di Lorito¹, Tahir Masud², John Gladman³, Maureen Godfrey³, Marianne Dunlop³, Alessandro Bosco⁴, Rowan H Harwood⁵

Affiliations

¹ Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. claudio.dilorito@nottingham.ac.uk.
² Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
³ Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
⁴ School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
⁵ Division of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.

Abstract

Background: Restrictions introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased risk of deconditioning in the general population. No empirical evidence of this effect however has been gathered in people living with dementia. This study aims to identify the causes and effects of COVID-19-related deconditioning in people living with dementia.

Methods: This is a longitudinal phenomenological qualitative study. Participants living with dementia, their caregivers and therapists involved in the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic were qualitatively interviewed at two time points: the baseline 2 months after the national lockdown was imposed in England (i.e., May 2020), the follow up 2 months after the first set (i.e. July 2020). The data were analysed through deductive thematic analysis.

Results: Twenty-four participants living with dementia, 19 caregivers and 15 therapists took part in the study. Two themes were identified: Causes of deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic and effects of deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. A self-reinforcing pattern was common, whereby lockdown made the person apathetic, demotivated, socially disengaged, and frailer. This reduced activity levels, which in turn reinforced the effects of deconditioning over time. Without external supporters, most participants lacked the motivation / cognitive abilities to keep active. Provided the proper infrastructure and support, some participants could use tele-rehabilitation to combat deconditioning.

Conclusion: The added risks and effects of deconditioning on people with dementia require considerable efforts from policy makers and clinicians to ensure that they initiate and maintain physical activity in prolonged periods of social distancing. Delivering rehabilitation in the same way as before the pandemic might not be feasible or sustainable and innovative approaches must be found. Digital support for this population has shown promising results but remains a challenge.

Trial registration: The PrAISED trial and process evaluation have received ethical approval number 18/YH/0059 from the Bradford/Leeds Ethics Committee. The ISRCTN Registration Number for PrAISED is 15320670 .

Keywords: COVID-19; Deconditioning; Dementia; Exercise; Physical activity.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

COVID-19*
Caregivers
Communicable Disease Control
Dementia* / diagnosis
Dementia* / epidemiology
Humans
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2