Graft survival of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in relation to two grafting techniques with dormant and sprouting buds

PeerJ. 2021 Sep 21:9:e12182. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12182. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Developing methods for successfully grafting forest species will be helpful for establishing asexual seed orchards and increasing the success of forest genetic improvement programs in Mexico. In this study we investigated the effects of two grafting techniques (side veneer and top cleft) and two phenological stages of the scion buds (end of latency and beginning of sprouting), in combination with other seven grafting variables, on the sprouting and survival of 120 intraspecific grafts of Pinus engelmannii Carr. The scions used for grafting were taken from a 5.5-year-old commercial forest plantation. The first grafting was performed on January 18 (buds at the end of dormancy) and the second on February 21 (buds at the beginning of sprouting). The data were examined by analysis of variance and a test of means and were fitted to two survival models (the Weibull's accelerated failure time and the Cox's proportional hazards model) and the respective hazard ratios were calculated. Survival was higher in the top cleft grafts made with buds at the end of latency, with 80% sprouting and an estimated average survival time of between 164 and 457 days after the end of the 6-month evaluation period. Four variables (grafting technique, phenological stage of the scion buds, scion diameter and rootstock height) significantly affected the risk of graft death in both survival models. Use of top cleft grafts with buds at the end of the latency stage, combined with scion diameters smaller than 11.4 mm and rootstock heights greater than 58.5 cm, was associated with a lower risk of death.

Keywords: Apache pine; Asexual propagation; Grafting survival; Side veneer grafting; Statistical survival analysis models; Top cleft grafting.

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) (441054) and Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Durango (COCYTED-12/02/18/265). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.