Determining the Distinguishing Features of Different Eating Action Types in Germany Using a Mixed-Method Approach

Lyn Lampmann; Agnes Emberger-Klein; Klaus Menrad

doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.720392

Determining the Distinguishing Features of Different Eating Action Types in Germany Using a Mixed-Method Approach

Front Nutr. 2021 Sep 14:8:720392. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.720392. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Lyn Lampmann¹, Agnes Emberger-Klein¹, Klaus Menrad¹

Affiliation

¹ Chair of Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Technical University of Munich Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Straubing, Germany.

Abstract

Food-related behavior is a very complex topic, as it affects the most diverse areas of life. Accordingly, wide varieties of disciplines have already dealt with the topic to understand it better. The result is that there is neither a uniform nutrition knowledge nor a uniform nutrition behavior. In order to reduce the complexity of a field of study, there is the methodical means of type-building. Both commercial and academic studies have already formed nutrition types, either by means of standardized questionnaires or with a specific content focus. However, since both individual and social aspects influence food-related behavior, we investigate how people integrate eating into their everyday life against the background of (competing) individual and social demands by focusing on the individual point of view, for which a mixed methods approach is used. Based on 42 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews conducted in Germany in 2017, we built qualitative food-related types in a first step, which are analyzed in this article using a quantitative content analysis and cross-over analysis to identify the particular distinguishing feature(s) of each type and test them for significance. The results show the prominent characteristics for each type and indicate furthermore that subjectivization, self-determination, the body as an instrument of power, adaptation to the environment and being overstrained with the own behavior are particularly prominent when it comes to eating. Moreover, we clearly identified The Overstrained and The Relaxed as independent eating action types, which we could not find anywhere else. The study shows that interventions, especially for The Overstrained and The Controlled, are necessary to achieve a relaxed approach to eating in everyday life. At the same time, systematic approaches should be used to intervene in cases of overstraining or controlled behavior.

Keywords: cross-over analysis; data transformation; eating action type; mixed-methods; quantitative content analysis.