Using cross efficiency method integrating regret theory and WASPAS to evaluate road safety performance of Chinese provinces

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Nov:162:106395. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106395. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

Abstract

Currently, the road safety performance of a national- or province-level is absorbing much attention from practitioners and academics. A variety of models based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) have been presented to appraise road safety performance in previous literature. However, the main weakness of these methods is that the decision-maker's psychological behavior is neglected. Besides, Cross Efficiency Method (CEM) adopts the weighted average to aggregate the cross efficiencies which may lead to information loss. To address these limitations, a hybrid road safety evaluation model was constructed by integrating CEM, regret theory, and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) to appraise the road safety performance of Chinese provinces. In the presented model, regret theory is employed to depict the psychological behavior of the decision-maker. Then entropy weight method is utilized to calculate the weight of self-evaluation and peer-evaluation. To reduce information loss, WASPAS is adopted to fuse the cross efficiencies and derive the ranking of decision-making units. Finally, the presented model is employed to assess the road safety efficiency in the province of mainland China. The results show that the mean of road safety efficiency score for the eastern, central, and western areas is gradually decreasing. Furthermore, the outcomes of a comparative analysis represent that the results obtained by the proposed model outperform the CEM and DEA road safety model.

Keywords: Cross Efficiency Method (CEM); Regret theory; Road safety performance; WASPAS.

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Traffic* / prevention & control
  • China
  • Emotions*
  • Humans