Single-session versus two-session placement of chest port and gastrostomy tube in patients with head and neck cancer: Is there any difference in the device-related early infection rates?

Philip Skummer; Katsuhiro Kobayashi; Mason Schoeneck; Jamynkumer Patel; Masoud Faridnia

doi:10.1177/20584601211037234

Single-session versus two-session placement of chest port and gastrostomy tube in patients with head and neck cancer: Is there any difference in the device-related early infection rates?

Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Aug 29;10(8):20584601211037234. doi: 10.1177/20584601211037234. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Authors

Philip Skummer¹, Katsuhiro Kobayashi², Mason Schoeneck², Jamynkumer Patel³, Masoud Faridnia⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
² Department of Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
³ Department of Anesthesiology, New York University, NewYork, NY, USA.
⁴ Department of Medicine, Virginia Common Wealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Abstract

Background: It is unknown whether placement of a chest port (port) and a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in a single session increases the risk of the early device infections in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing chemoradiation.

Purpose: To compare the incidence of early (≤30 days) port and G-tube infections placed in a single session compared to two separate sessions in patients with HNC.

Material and methods: Between January 2012 and December 2019, 169 patients with HNC undergoing chemoradiation had a port and a G-tube placed in a single session (single-session group), while 25 had both devices placed in two separate sessions (two-session group) within 30 days of each other. The incidence of early device infections was compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine if the number of sessions was a variable affecting device infections.

Results: A total of 6 (3%) early port infections and 13 (6.7%) early G-tube infections were identified. The two groups did not significantly differ in the incidence of early port infections (3.0%, 5/169 and 4.0%, 1/25, p = 0.59) nor early G-tube infections (7.1%, 12/169 and 4.0%, 1/25, p = 1.0). The number of sessions for device placement was not a variable affecting overall device infections in logistic regression analyses (odds ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-7.82, p = 0.82) after controlling for potential confounding variables.

Conclusions: The risk of early device infections in single-session placement appeared to be the same as two-session placement in patients with HNC undergoing chemoradiation.

Keywords: chest port; gastrostomy; infection < topics.