Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by antigen ELISA test is highly swayed by viral load and sample storage condition

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022 Mar;20(3):473-481. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1976144. Epub 2021 Sep 11.

Abstract

Background: Rapid increase in COVID-19 suspected cases has rendered disease diagnosis challenging, mainly depending upon RT-qPCR. Reliable, rapid, and cost-effective diagnostic assays that complement RT-qPCR should be introduced after thoroughly evaluating their performance upon various disease phases, viral load, and sample storage conditions.

Objective: We investigated the correlation of cycle threshold (Ct) value, which implies the viral load and infection phase, and the storage condition of the clinical specimen with the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 through our newly developed in-house rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system.

Method: Naso-oropharyngeal samples of 339 COVID-19 suspected cases were collected and evaluated through RT-qPCR that were stored up to 30 days in different conditions (i.e. -80°C, -20°C and initially at 4°C followed by -80°C). The clinical specimens were evaluated with our in-house ELISA system after finalizing the assay method through checkerboard assay and minimizing the signal/noise ratio.

Result: The ELISA system showed the highest sensitivity (92.9%) for samples with Ct ≤30 and preserving at -80°C temperature. The sensitivity reduced proportionally with increasing Ct value and preserving temperature. However, the specificity ranged between 98.3% and 100%.

Conclusion: The results indicate the necessity of early infection phase diagnosis and lower temperature preservation of samples to perform rapid antigen ELISA tests.

Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; SARS-CoV-2; antigen; cycle threshold; nucleocapsid; rapid.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Humans
  • SARS-CoV-2* / isolation & purification
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Specimen Handling*
  • Viral Load*

Grants and funding

This paper was not funded.