Removal of As(III) by Electrically Conducting Ultrafiltration Membranes

Shengcun Ma; Fan Yang; Xin Chen; Chia Miang Khor; Bongyeon Jung; Arpita Iddya; Gaurav Sant; David Jassby

doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117592

Removal of As(III) by Electrically Conducting Ultrafiltration Membranes

Water Res. 2021 Oct 1:204:117592. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117592. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Authors

Shengcun Ma¹, Fan Yang¹, Xin Chen², Chia Miang Khor¹, Bongyeon Jung¹, Arpita Iddya¹, Gaurav Sant³, David Jassby⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
² Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Laboratory for the Chemistry of Construction Materials (LC2), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Institute for Carbon Management (ICM), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
³ Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Laboratory for the Chemistry of Construction Materials (LC2), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Institute for Carbon Management (ICM), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; California Nano systems Institute (CNSI), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
⁴ Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Institute for Carbon Management (ICM), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: jassby@ucla.edu.

PMID: 34469809
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117592

Abstract

As(III) species are the predominant form of arsenic found in groundwater. However, nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes are often unable to effectively reject As(III). In this study, we fabricate highly conducting ultrafiltration (UF) membranes for effective As(III) rejection. These membranes consist of a hydrophilic nickel-carbon nanotubes layer deposited on a UF support, and used as cathodes. Applying cathodic potentials significantly increased As(III) rejection in synthetic/real tap water, a result of locally elevated pH that is brought upon through water electrolysis at the membrane/water interface. The elevated pH conditions convert H₃ASO₃ to H₂AsO₃^-/HAsO₃^2- that are rejected by the negatively charged membranes. In addition, it was found that Mg(OH)₂ that precipitates on the membrane can further trap arsenic. Importantly, almost all As(III) passing through the membranes is oxidized to As(V) by hydrogen peroxide produced on the cathode, which significantly decreased its overall toxicity and mobility. Although the high pH along the membrane surface led to mineral scaling, this scale could be partially removed by backwashing the membrane. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of effective As(III) removal using low-pressure membranes, with As(III) rejection higher than that achieved by NF and RO, and high water permeance.

Keywords: Arsenite removal; Electrically conductive membranes; Groundwater; Ultrafiltration membranes.

MeSH terms

Arsenic*
Membranes, Artificial
Nanotubes, Carbon*
Osmosis
Ultrafiltration
Water Purification*

Substances

Membranes, Artificial
Nanotubes, Carbon
Arsenic