Background Although severe hypercholesterolemia confers a 5-fold increased long-term risk for coronary artery disease, treatment guidelines may not be fully implemented, leading to underdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment. To further understand the clinical features and gaps in treatment approaches, we analyzed electronic medical record data from a midwestern US multidisciplinary healthcare system, between 2009 and 2020. Methods and Results We retrospectively assessed the prevalence, clinical presentation, and treatment characteristics of individuals currently treated with statin therapy having a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value that is either (1) an actual maximum electronic medical record-documented LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (group 1, n=7542) or (2) an estimated pretreatment LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (group 2, n=7710). Comorbidities and prescribed lipid-lowering therapies were assessed. Statistical analyses identified differences among individuals within and between groups. Of records analyzed (n=266 282), 7% met the definition for primary severe hypercholesterolemia. Group 1 had more comorbidities than group 2. More individuals in both groups were treated by primary care providers (49.8%-53.0%, 32.6%-36.4%) than by specialty providers (4.1%-5.5%, 2.1%-3.3%). High-intensity lipid-lowering therapy was prescribed less frequently for group 2 than for group 1, but moderate-intensity statins were prescribed more frequently for group 2 (65%) than for group 1 (52%). Conclusions Two percent of patients in our study population being treated with low- or moderate-intensity statins have an estimated LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (indicating severe hypercholesterolemia), but receive less aggressive treatment than patients with a maximum measured LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL.
Keywords: clinical inertia; electronic medical records; estimated LDL‐C; familial hypercholesterolemia; gaps in care; lipid‐lowering therapies; severe hypercholesterolemia; statin.