Medical device infections are costly, while preclinical assessment of antimicrobial properties for new materials is time intensive and imperfect at capturing the interrelated aspects of infection response and wound resolution. Herein, we developed an in vivo model for quantification of inflammatory and biocompatibility responses in the presence of a sustained implant-associated infection. The antimicrobial effectiveness of commercially available polymer materials was compared to that of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) materials modified with putative antimicrobial strategies as example test materials. Materials were incubated with bioluminescent Escherichia coli prior to implantation in a dorsal subcutaneous pocket in rats with an additional intraluminal bolus of bacteria. Infection kinetics were monitored with bioluminescence, and inflammatory infiltrate and fibrous capsule thickness were determined from stained histological sections. Our model resulted in a persistent infection, sensitive to antimicrobial effects, as the materials modified with a putative antimicrobial surface were able to significantly reduce the level of infection in animals at day 4 postimplantation with efficacy similar to that of commercially available antimicrobial drug-eluting polymers (positive controls). At day 30 postimplantation, the antimicrobial surface modified TPU tubing was found to promote complete elimination of intraluminal bacteria in the absence of antibiotics. Differences were also measurable in acute inflammation, as Wright-Giemsa staining demonstrated reduced inflammatory cell infiltration at day 4 postimplantation for antimicrobial TPU materials. Additionally, antimicrobial materials exhibited reduced fibrous capsule thickness coinciding with infection resolution, as compared to unmodified TPU controls. The developed model can be utilized for testing antimicrobial polymers in the context of a prolonged infection while also revealing concurrent differences in the infiltrating immune cell profiles and fibrous capsule thickness, thus improving the relevance of preclinical medical device material testing.
Keywords: biocompatibility; bioluminescence; contamination; medical devices; wound healing.