In-house abbreviated qualification of a real-time polymerase chain reaction method and strategies to amplify mycoplasma detection in human mesenchymal stromal cells

Abstract

Background aims: In this study, the authors performed an in-house abbreviated qualification of a commercially available real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit for limit of detection (LOD), matrix interference and ruggedness of mycoplasma detection in a human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC(M)) investigational cell product (NCT02351011). The approach used was similar to an abbreviated qualification the authors previously conducted for endpoint PCR, which was accepted by Canadian regulators for final product release of the same MSC(M) investigational cell product for treatment of osteoarthritis patients (NCT02351011). With patient consent, biobanked MSCs(M) were re-analyzed by real-time PCR for mycoplasma detection to conduct in-house qualification of the kit.

Methods: LOD was determined by spiking MSCs(M) with a series of 10-fold dilutions of two commercially available genomic DNA (gDNA) reference standards for Mycoplasma arginini (M. arginini) and Mycoplasma hominis (M. hominis). Matrix interference was tested by using 10-fold dilutions of MSC(M)s down to 4500 cells/mL. Polyadenylic acid (poly[A]) was used to improve DNA recovery in samples with 4500-45 000 MSCs(M)/mL. Real-time PCR tests performed on different days were compared to evaluate ruggedness.

Results: Real-time PCR analysis showed a conservative LOD of 40 genome copies (GCs)/mL and 240 GCs/mL, which are equivalent to 10 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL, for M. arginini and M. hominis, respectively. According to a less conservative manufacturer-based criterion for positivity, the kit detected 0.4 GC/mL (0.1 CFU/mL) and 24 GCs/mL (1 CFU/mL) M. arginini and M. hominis, respectively. Real-time PCR with different MSC(M) dilutions did not show matrix interference. However, DNA recovery was compromised at MSC(M) concentrations at or below 45 000 cells/mL. The addition of poly(A) as a DNA carrier improved DNA recovery and allowed an LOD, considered here to be equivalent to 10 CFUs/mL, to be achieved, which was not possible in diluted MSC(M) samples (≤45 000 cells/mL) in the absence of poly(A). Ruggedness was demonstrated with tests (n = 18) performed on different days, with an average overall inter-assay percent coefficient of variation of less than 4 for M. arginini (3.62 [400 GCs/mL], 3.61 [40 GCs/mL]) and less than 3 for M. hominis (2.83 [2400 GCs/mL], 1.95 [240 GCs/mL]).

Conclusions: A commercially available real-time PCR mycoplasma detection kit was qualified for evaluating mycoplasma contamination in investigational MSC(M) products and met the criteria used previously (and accepted by Canadian regulators) for in-house qualification of an endpoint PCR mycoplasma detection kit, and the addition of poly(A) addressed the poor recovery of mycoplasma gDNA in samples with low cell numbers.

Keywords: matrix interference; mesenchymal stromal cells; mycoplasma; poly(A) carrier RNA; qualification; real-time PCR.