"The health equity curse": ethical tensions in promoting health equity

BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;21(1):1567. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11594-y.

Abstract

Background: Public health (PH) practitioners have a strong moral commitment to health equity and social justice. However, PH values often do not align with health systems values, making it challenging for PH practitioners to promote health equity. In spite of a growing range of PH ethics frameworks and theories, little is known about ethical concerns related to promotion of health equity in PH practice. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical concerns of PH practitioners in promoting health equity in the context of mental health promotion and prevention of harms of substance use.

Methods: As part of a broader program of public health systems and services research, we interviewed 32 PH practitioners.

Results: Using constant comparative analysis, we identified four systemic ethical tensions: [1] biomedical versus social determinants of health agenda; [2] systems driven agendas versus situational care; [3] stigma and discrimination versus respect for persons; and [4] trust and autonomy versus surveillance and social control.

Conclusions: Naming these tensions provides insights into the daily ethical challenges of PH practitioners and an opportunity to reflect on the relevance of PH frameworks. These findings highlight the value of relational ethics as a promising approach for developing ethical frameworks for PH practice.

Keywords: Health equity; Mental health promotion; Prevention of substance use harms; Relational ethics; Stigma and discrimination.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Health Equity*
  • Health Promotion
  • Humans
  • Morals
  • Public Health
  • Social Justice