Background: Computer-assisted navigation (CAS) was developed to improve the surgical accuracy and precision. Many studies demonstrated better alignment in the coronal plane in CAS TKA compared to conventional technique. The influence on the functional outcome is still unclear. Only few studies report long-term results of CAS TKA. This study was initiated to investigate 10-year patient-reported outcome of CAS and conventional TKA.
Methods: From initially 80 patients of a randomized study of CAS and conventional TKA a total of 50 patients could be evaluated at the 10-year follow-up. The Knee Society Score and EuroQuol Questionnaire were assessed. For all patients a competing risk analysis for revision was performed.
Results: The patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated similar values for both groups. The 10-year risk for revision was 2.5% for conventional TKA and 7.5% for CAS TKA (p=0.237).
Conclusions: There was no difference between CAS and conventional TKA with regard to patient-reported outcome and revision risk ten years after surgery.
Trial registration: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 11/30/2009, ID: NCT01022099 .
Keywords: Computer-assisted; Knee arthroplasty; Knee replacement; Navigation; Patient-reported outcome; Results.
© 2021. The Author(s).