A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analyses to Assess the Effectiveness of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Self-testing Distribution Strategies

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;73(4):e1018-e1028. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab029.

Abstract

Background: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify which human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-testing (HIVST) distribution strategies are most effective.

Methods: We abstracted data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies published between 4 June 2006 and 4 June 2019.

Results: We included 33 studies, yielding 6 HIVST distribution strategies. All distribution strategies increased testing uptake compared to standard testing: in sub-Saharan Africa, partner HIVST distribution ranked highest (78% probability); in North America, Asia, and the Pacific regions, web-based distribution ranked highest (93% probability), and facility based distribution ranked second in all settings. Across HIVST distribution strategies HIV positivity and linkage was similar to standard testing.

Conclusions: A range of HIVST distribution strategies are effective in increasing HIV testing. HIVST distribution by sexual partners, web-based distribution, as well as health facility distribution strategies should be considered for implementation to expand the reach of HIV testing services.

Keywords: HIV self-testing; implementation; network meta-analysis; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • HIV
  • HIV Infections* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Self-Testing*
  • Sexual Partners