Separate introductions or post-introduction evolution may lead to multiple invader genotypes or cytotypes that differ in growth rates, biomass or chemical profile responses (phenotype) to a range of environments. If the invader has high trait plasticity to a range of resource levels, then sediment N or P enrichment may enhance invasiveness. However, the ways in which ploidy, plasticity, and available N or P interact are unknown for most species despite the potential to explain spread and impacts by invaders with multiple introduced lineages. We conducted a common garden experiment with four triploid and six diploid populations of Butomus umbellatus, collected from across its invasive range in the USA. Plants were grown under different N or P nutrient levels (4, 40, 200, 400 mg L-1 N; 0.4, 4, 40 mg L-1 P) and we measured reaction norms for biomass, clonal reproduction and tissue chemistry. Contrary to our expectation, triploid B. umbellatus plants were less plastic to variation in N or P than diploid B. umbellatus in most measured traits. Diploid plants produced 172 % more reproductive biomass and 57 % more total biomass across levels of N, and 158 % more reproductive biomass and 33 % more total biomass across P than triploid plants. Triploid plants had lower shoot:root ratios and produced 30 % and 150 % more root biomass than diploid plants in response to increases in N and P, respectively. Tissue chemistry differed between cytotypes but plasticity was similar; N was 8 % higher and C:N ratio was 30 % lower in triploid than diploid plants across levels of N and plant parts, and N was 22 % higher and C:N ratio 27 % lower across levels of P and plant parts. Our results highlight differences in nutrient response between cytotypes of a widespread invader, and we call for additional field studies to better understand the interaction of nutrients and ploidy during invasion.
Keywords: Biomass allocation; flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus); nutrient enrichment; phenotypic plasticity; plant invasion; polyploidy.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company 2021.