Background: The search for a less invasive and lower cost cryoballoon-based strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has resulted in a simplified procedure that may be suitable for cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Here, we compared procedural characteristics and outcomes between conventional CBA and simple CBA.
Methods: We enrolled 628 consecutive patients who underwent initial CBA for AF (age, 69 ± 12 years; female, 263 (42%); paroxysmal AF, 576 (92%); CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.7 ± 1.6 points). Simple CBA was characterized by the minimal procedure required to isolate pulmonary veins, including the following: (1) CBA was performed without guidance from a 3-D mapping system; (2) a coronary sinus electrode and esophageal temperature probe were not used; (3) a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation was not set; and AF induction by isoproterenol and atrial burst stimuli were not performed.
Results: Simple CBA was performed in 240 (38%) patients. Procedural time (49 ± 18 versus 85 ± 27 min, p < 0.01) was shorter, and total procedural costs (20,699 ± 8,091 versus 30,350 ± 11,647 US dollars, p < 0.01) were lower with simple CBA than conventional CBA. Freedom from AF recurrence during the 12-month study period (79.8% versus 78.4%, p = 0.52) and complication rate (8.8% versus 13.1%, p = 0.09) were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Compared with conventional CBA, simple CBA reduced procedural time and procedural costs while providing comparable outcomes.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Cryoballoon ablation; Procedural costs; Procedural time.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.