A systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric normative peripheral quantitative computed tomography data

Maria Medeleanu; Reza Vali; Shadab Sadeghpour; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria

doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101103

A systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric normative peripheral quantitative computed tomography data

Bone Rep. 2021 Jul 7:15:101103. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101103. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Authors

Maria Medeleanu^{1

2}, Reza Vali^{1

3}, Shadab Sadeghpour², Rahim Moineddin⁴, Andrea S Doria^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
² Translational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Canada.
³ Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical imaging, University of Toronto, Canada.
⁴ Biostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Peripheral-quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) provides an intriguing diagnostic alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) since it can measure 3D bone geometry and differentiate between the cortical and trabecular bone compartments.

Objective: To investigate and summarize the methods of pQCT image acquisition of in children, adolescents and/or young adults (up to age 20) and to aggregate the published normative pQCT data.

Evidence acquisition: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1947 to December 2020. Quality of the included articles was assessed using Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) scoring system and United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) Study Design Categorization. Seven articles, encompassing a total of 2134 participants, were aggregated in the meta-analysis. Due to dissimilar age groups and scan sites, only seven pQCT parameters of the 4% radius, 4% tibia and 38% tibia were analyzed in this meta-analysis.

Evidence synthesis: The overall fixed-effect estimates of trabecular vBMD of the 4% radius were: 207.16 (201.46, 212.86), mg/cm³ in 8 to 9 year-old girls, 210.42 (201.91, 218.93)in 10 to 12 year-old girls, 226.99 (222.45, 231.54) in 12 to 13 year-old girls, 259.97 (254.85, 265.10) in 12 to 13 year-old boys and 171.55 (163.41,179.69) in 16 to 18 year-old girls. 21 of 54 (38.9%) primary papers received a 'good' STARD quality of reporting score (<90 and 70 ≥ %) (mean STARD score of all articles = 69.4%). The primary articles of this review had a 'good' level USPSTF study design categorization. However, most of the normative data in these articles were non-comparable and non-aggregable due to a lack of standardization of reference lines, acquisition parameters and/or age at acquisition.

Conclusion: There is not sufficient evidence to suggest that pQCT is appropriately suited for use in the pediatric clinical setting. Normative pediatric data must be systematically derived for pQCT should it ever be a modality that is used outside of research.

Clinical impact: We demonstrate the need for normative pQCT reference data and for clinical guidelines that standardize pediatric acquisition parameters and delineate its use in pediatric settings.

Keywords: Adolescents; Children; Meta-analysis; Pediatric radiology; Peripheral quantitative computed tomography; Systematic review; Young adults.

Publication types

Review