A novel cascade allows Metarhizium robertsii to distinguish cuticle and hemocoel microenvironments during infection of insects

PLoS Biol. 2021 Aug 4;19(8):e3001360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001360. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Pathogenic fungi precisely respond to dynamic microenvironments during infection, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. The insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii is a representative fungus in which to study broad themes of fungal pathogenicity as it resembles some major plant and mammalian pathogenic fungi in its pathogenesis. Here we report on a novel cascade that regulates response of M. robertsii to 2 distinct microenvironments during its pathogenesis. On the insect cuticle, the transcription factor COH2 activates expression of cuticle penetration genes. In the hemocoel, the protein COH1 is expressed due to the reduction in epigenetic repression conferred by the histone deacetylase HDAC1 and the histone 3 acetyltransferase HAT1. COH1 interacts with COH2 to reduce COH2 stability, and this down-regulates cuticle penetration genes and up-regulates genes for hemocoel colonization. Our work significantly advances the insights into fungal pathogenicity in insects.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cellular Microenvironment
  • Fungal Proteins / genetics
  • Fungal Proteins / metabolism*
  • Histone Acetyltransferases / metabolism
  • Histone Deacetylases / metabolism
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions*
  • Metarhizium / pathogenicity
  • Metarhizium / physiology*
  • Moths / microbiology*
  • Protein Stability
  • Transcription Factors / metabolism

Substances

  • Fungal Proteins
  • Transcription Factors
  • Histone Acetyltransferases
  • Histone Deacetylases

Supplementary concepts

  • Metarhizium robertsii

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/), and the grant numbers are 31672078 and 31872021. W.F received these two grants. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.