MIR spectroscopy versus MALDI-ToF-MS for authenticity control of honeys from different botanical origins based on soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA) - A clash of techniques?

Abstract

In this study, highly reproducible MIR spectroscopy and highly sensitive MALDI-ToF-MS data were directly compared for the metabolomic profiling of monofloral and multifloral honey samples from three different botanical origins canola, acacia, and honeydew. Subsequently, three different classification models were applied to the data of both techniques, PCA-LDA, PCA- kNN, and soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA) as class modelling technique. All monofloral external test set samples were classified correctly by PCA-LDA and SIMCA with both data sets, while multifloral test set samples could only be identified as outliers by the SIMCA technique, which is a crucial aspect in the authenticity control of honey. The comparison of the two used analytical techniques resulted in better overall classification results for the monofloral external test set samples with the MIR spectroscopic data. Additionally, clearly more multifloral external samples were identified as outliers by MIR spectroscopy (91.3%) as compared to MALDI-ToF-MS (78.3%). The results indicate that the high reproducibility of the used MIR technique leads to a generally better ability of separating monofloral honeys and in particular, identifying multifloral honeys. This demonstrates that benchtop-based techniques may operate on an eye-level with high-end laboratory-based equipment, when paired with an optimal data analysis strategy.

Keywords: Authenticity; Honey; MALDI-ToF-MS; MIR spectroscopy; Machine learning.