Assessment of agro-morphological, physiological and yield traits diversity among tropical rice

PeerJ. 2021 Jul 19:9:e11752. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11752. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an essential staple food crop, but the per acre average rice yield is less than its substantial potential in many countries. Rice breeders and growers would benefit from a robust genotypes with better morpho-physiological and yield-related traits. Here, seventy-four new rice genotypes were phenotyped over two years for their gas exchange and yield potential-related traits under Mississippi rice-growing conditions. A wide range of variability was observed among genotypes for all measured traits. Detailed phenotyping of rice genotypes revealed two key relationships that function together to contribute to yield potential under the southern US climate. The first one, grain yield, grain number, and spikelet fertility, showed considerable correlation (r = 0.45 to 0.79, p < 0.001) to harvest index. Conversely, days to anthesis had a high and negative correlation with harvest index (r = -0.79, p < 0.001), which suggests that selection for short duration genotypes with efficient partitioning could improve the yields under southern US climatic conditions. Additive response index revealed a higher positive association with yield traits (R2 = 0.59) than physiological (R2 = 0.28) and morphological traits (R2 = 0.21). Compared with the commercial genotype Rex, 21.6% and 47.3% of the rice genotypes had a higher gas exchange and yield response scores. IR08A172, IR07K142 and IR07F287 were ranked as high performers in physiological and yield response indices. Our study highlights that selection for short-duration yield-related traits with efficient sink capacity traits is desirable for future breeding programs.

Keywords: Early and late maturity; Individual and total response indices; Morpho-physiological; Phenotypic diversity; Rice.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) through CIMMYT, the Mississippi Rice Promotion Board, and National Institute for Food and Agriculture, NIFA 2019‐34263‐30552 and MIS 043050. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.