Dimensionality reduction by UMAP reinforces sample heterogeneity analysis in bulk transcriptomic data

Cell Rep. 2021 Jul 27;36(4):109442. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109442.

Abstract

Transcriptomic analysis plays a key role in biomedical research. Linear dimensionality reduction methods, especially principal-component analysis (PCA), are widely used in detecting sample-to-sample heterogeneity, while recently developed non-linear methods, such as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), can efficiently cluster heterogeneous samples in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. Yet, the application of t-SNE and UMAP in bulk transcriptomic analysis and comparison with conventional methods have not been achieved. We compare four major dimensionality reduction methods (PCA, multidimensional scaling [MDS], t-SNE, and UMAP) in analyzing 71 large bulk transcriptomic datasets. UMAP is superior to PCA and MDS but shows some advantages over t-SNE in differentiating batch effects, identifying pre-defined biological groups, and revealing in-depth clusters in two-dimensional space. Importantly, UMAP generates sample clusters uncovering biological features and clinical meaning. We recommend deploying UMAP in visualizing and analyzing sizable bulk transcriptomic datasets to reinforce sample heterogeneity analysis.

Keywords: PCA; UMAP; bulk transcriptomics; clustering structure; dimensionality reduction; heterogeneity analysis; t-SNE.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Data Analysis*
  • Databases, Genetic
  • Gene Expression Profiling*
  • Humans
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Reproducibility of Results