Background: Patients often present with symptoms that are disproportionate to the observed disease state, and grade disease severity differently from healthcare providers (HPs). This discordant symptom burden and severity grading (DSG) results in poorer patient care. Current research on DSG is limited, relying on structured models that are theoretically incomplete.
Objective: To fully understand the factors driving DSG.
Methods: Qualitative study of dermatology patients and HPs. Interview data were analyzed using grounded theory to derive a model of the causes of DSG.
Results: Eighteen patients and 12 HPs were interviewed. Results reflect a tendency for patients to grade their conditions more severely than HPs. Factors driving DSG are related to emotional and cognitive disparities in the constructs used to grade severity, varying consequences of disease due to differing resilience and coping methods, socio-psychological factors influencing how patients report their symptoms, and the context of the consult.
Conclusion: A better understanding of DSG is required for achieving mutual understanding and patient-centered collaborative care. It is easy to label a patient with high symptom burden as having a low threshold for discomfort, or for a patient to presume that the doctor is unempathetic. This study suggests the causes of DSG are nuanced and multifactorial.
Keywords: Discordant severity grading; behavioral medicine; health services research; qualitative research; symptom burden.