A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top-Cited Articles on Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Sep;22(3):588-598. doi: 10.1177/15347346211034388. Epub 2021 Jul 26.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the top-cited articles in the field of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) research. A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis was conducted in January 2021 by using Boolean search terms in the Scopus and the Web of Science databases. The 50 top-cited articles that met the inclusion criteria were ranked and evaluated for several characteristics, including year of publication, country of origin, authorship, publishing journal, topic categories, publishing type, and level of evidence. The median number of citations per article in the list was 442 (interquartile range [IQR], 320-520), with a median of 21.8 citations (IQR, 16.5-34.5) per year since publication. The publication years ranged from 1986 to 2017, with 1998 accounting for the greatest number of studies (n = 7). The citation classics were published in 20 journals and originated from institutions in 9 countries. The majority of the studies were clinical, of which expert opinion/review with Level V evidence and clinical studies with Levels I and II evidence comprised the greater proportion in the list. This study provides useful insights into the history and development of DFU research. The top-cited list may serve as a quick reference for education curriculums and clinical practice, in addition to providing a foundation for further studies on this topic.

Keywords: analysis; bibliometric; citation; diabetic foot ulcers; lower extremity wound; top-cited articles.

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Databases, Factual
  • Diabetes Mellitus*
  • Diabetic Foot* / therapy
  • Humans