Analysis of misses in imaging of head and neck pathology by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary academic medical centre

Clin Radiol. 2021 Oct;76(10):786.e9-786.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

Abstract

Aim: To analyse errors in head and neck (H&N) pathology made by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary-care centre.

Materials and methods: A neuroradiology quality assurance (QA) database of radiological errors was searched for attending physician errors in H&N pathology from 2014-2020. Data were limited to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. Data were collected on missed pathologies and study types. Misses were grouped into three categories: central neck (thyroid gland, aerodigestive tract), lateral neck (salivary glands, lymph nodes, soft tissues), and face/orbits (orbits, sinuses, masticator space).

Results: During the study period, a total of 283,248 CT and MRI neuroradiology examinations were interpreted (all indications). Seventy-four H&N misses were identified comprising 85.1% perceptual and 14.9% interpretive errors. The distribution of errors was face/orbits (37.8%), central neck (36.5%), and lateral neck (25.7%). Clinically significant errors were found most commonly in the aerodigestive tract (21%), orbits (17.7%), masticator space, and parotid glands (14.5% each). The majority (67.6%) of the misses were detected on examinations that were not performed for a primary H&N indication; MRI brain was the most common examination (27%). Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses accounted for 48.6% of all misses.

Conclusion: The majority of H&N misses were perceptual and were detected on examinations not performed for a H&N indication. Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses represented half of all misses.

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Diagnostic Errors / statistics & numerical data*
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Radiologists*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tertiary Care Centers
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*