A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254214. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Introduction: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Points. Facility-based models include Fast Track Drug Refill, Facility Based Group and Facility Based Individual Management. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of these ART delivery models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models.

Methods: Between December 2019 and February 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n = 116) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in differentiated ART models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analysed by thematic approach.

Results: Most facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of differentiated ART delivery in 2018. Fast Track Drug Delivery was the most common facility-based model (implemented in 100 or 86% of health facilities). Community Client-Led ART Delivery was the most popular community model (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points had the lowest uptake with only 33 (24.88%) facilities implementing them. By ownership-type, for-profit facilities reported the lowest uptake of differentiated ART models. Barriers to enrolment in community-based models include HIV-related stigma and low enrolment of adult males in community models.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national coverage of differentiated ART delivery models in Uganda. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Interventions for enhancing the uptake of differentiated ART models in for-profit facilities are recommended.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase I
  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities*
  • Anti-HIV Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Female
  • Government Programs*
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • HIV Infections / epidemiology
  • HIV-1
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Uganda / epidemiology

Substances

  • Anti-HIV Agents

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Office of the Vice Chancellor, Makerere University (MAK/VC/127/19). This study received seed funding from the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (www.cartafrica.org) through a post-doctoral re-entry grant (CARTA/2019/251.647G) with funds provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The funders has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.