Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review

Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(3):275-283. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00466-1. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

Abstract

Purpose of the review: The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia.

Recent findings: Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome.

Summary: Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Desflurane; Propofol; Sevoflurane; Total intravenous anesthesia; Volatile anesthetics.

Publication types

  • Review