Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy for gynaecologic malignancies

Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):272-277. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13628. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

Abstract

Wound complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity among patients with gynaecologic malignancies. We evaluated whether the placement of closed-incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) at the time of laparotomy for gynaecologic cancer surgery reduced wound complication rates. A retrospective cohort study with primary wound closure performed by a gynaecologic oncologist was carried out. We evaluated two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in 2017 with standard closure and patients who underwent surgery in 2019 with the placement of prophylactic ciNPT. Postoperative outcomes were examined. A total of 143 patients were included, 85 (59.4%) vs 58 (40.6%) with standard closure and ciNPT, respectively. The total complication rate in our sample was 38.71%. The rate of surgical complications in patients treated with ciNPT was 6.9% compared with 31.8% (P = .000) in patients treated with standard closure. In the analysis of complications, a significant reduction in infections (17.1%), seromas (15.4%), and wound dehiscence (17.1%) were observed when ciNPT was applied. The median hospital stay was 8 vs 6 days in the standard closure vs ciNPT groups (P = .048). The use of the prophylactic ciNPT following a laparotomy may decrease wound complications and hospital stays in oncological patients. ciNPT could be considered as part of clinical practice in patients at high risk of wound complications, such as patients with gynaecological malignancies.

Keywords: gynecologic neoplasms; laparotomy; negative-pressure wound therapy; postoperative care; wound healing.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgical Wound Infection / etiology
  • Surgical Wound Infection / prevention & control