Key considerations when using the sulforhodamine B assay for screening novel anticancer agents

Anticancer Drugs. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):6-10. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001131.

Abstract

Anticancer drug discovery programmes use a large number of in-vitro assays to screen the potency of compound libraries. The accuracy and reliability of these in-vitro assays are vital in selecting potent lead candidates for further (pre)clinical studies. Among the commonly used cell viability assays, the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay has been a popular choice due to its simplicity, accuracy, reliability and reproducibility. SRB dye interacts with protein's basic amino acids and viable cell number is determined based on the cellular protein content. In this study, the cytotoxic potency of the novel hydroxythiopyridone derivatives towards A549 and H522 cells was determined using the SRB assay. The known drugs oxaliplatin and vorinostat were also examined. The resulting EC50 values were accurate, reliable and reproducible. However, all EC50 values calculated in 6-well plates were higher compared to those determined from 96-well plates. Furthermore, results from 6-well plates were also more variable compared to 96-well plates. Our results confirm that SRB assay is a reliable technique in screening the potency of anticancer drug candidates but plating conditions need to be carefully considered.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / pharmacology*
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Survival / drug effects
  • Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor / methods*
  • Humans
  • Oxaliplatin / pharmacology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Rhodamines*
  • Vorinostat / pharmacology

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Rhodamines
  • Oxaliplatin
  • lissamine rhodamine B
  • Vorinostat