Discerning best practices in XFEL-based biological crystallography - standards for nonstandard experiments

IUCrJ. 2021 Jun 30;8(Pt 4):532-543. doi: 10.1107/S205225252100467X. eCollection 2021 Jul 1.

Abstract

Serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) is a novel tool in structural biology. In contrast to conventional crystallography, SFX relies on merging partial intensities acquired with X-ray beams of often randomly fluctuating properties from a very large number of still diffraction images of generally randomly oriented microcrystals. For this reason, and possibly due to limitations of the still evolving data-analysis programs, XFEL-derived SFX data are typically of a lower quality than 'standard' crystallographic data. In contrast with this, the studies performed at XFELs often aim to investigate issues that require precise high-resolution data, for example to determine structures of intermediates at low occupancy, which often display very small conformational changes. This is a potentially dangerous combination and underscores the need for a critical evaluation of procedures including data-quality standards in XFEL-based structural biology. Here, such concerns are addressed.

Keywords: X-ray free-electron lasers; data analysis; error models; extrapolated structure-factor amplitudes; serial femtosecond crystallography; structural biology; time-resolved crystallography.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This work was funded by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft.