Glenoid Bone Loss Is a Risk Factor for Poor Clinical Results After Coracoid Transfer in Rugby Players With Shoulder Dislocations

Kenta Shibuya; Takayuki Kawasaki; Yoshinori Hasegawa; Yoshinori Gonda; Yoshiaki Itoigawa; Shogo Sobue; Takefumi Kaketa; Muneaki Ishijima

doi:10.1177/2325967121993233

Glenoid Bone Loss Is a Risk Factor for Poor Clinical Results After Coracoid Transfer in Rugby Players With Shoulder Dislocations

Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):2325967121993233. doi: 10.1177/2325967121993233. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Authors

Kenta Shibuya¹, Takayuki Kawasaki¹, Yoshinori Hasegawa¹, Yoshinori Gonda¹, Yoshiaki Itoigawa², Shogo Sobue¹, Takefumi Kaketa¹, Muneaki Ishijima¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
² Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Although surgical shoulder stabilization via coracoid transfer in collision athletes is effective and has a low reinjury rate, the factors affecting poor clinical results and the superiority of the 2 stabilization procedures (Bristow and Latarjet) remain unclear.

Purpose: To explore the factor(s) affecting poor clinical results of coracoid transfer in a large cohort of rugby players and to compare postoperative function between the Bristow and Latarjet procedures.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This study included 169 consecutive shoulders of 154 competitive male rugby players who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery (Bankart repair with coracoid transfer) between 2014 and 2018 and had a mean follow-up of 2.7 years (minimum follow-up, 2 years). The Bristow procedure was performed in the first 92 shoulders (84 players), and the Latarjet procedure was performed in the latter 77 shoulders (70 players). A poor clinical result was defined as a postoperative Rowe score of <70 and a postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score of >630. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors affecting postoperative functional failure. The postoperative scores and complication rates were also compared between the 2 procedures.

Results: In total, 92.3% of the rugby players returned to their preinjury competition level at a mean of 5.9 months postoperatively. The Rowe and WOSI scores showed that shoulder function was improved postoperatively compared with preoperatively. The number of rugby players with a poor clinical result was 18 (10.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a poor clinical result was associated with a preoperative glenoid bone defect of >20% of the glenoid width (odds ratio, 9.8), whereas the clinical result was unaffected by the type of coracoid transfer. There were no differences between the 2 procedures in any of the postoperative scores or complication rates.

Conclusion: The present study indicated that the most effective predictor of postoperative functional scores was the degree of the glenoid bone defect and not the type of coracoid transfer. This information may be useful for the strategic treatment of shoulder dislocations in collision athletes.

Keywords: Bristow-Latarjet; clinical outcome; collision athlete; rugby; shoulder dislocation; shoulder instability.