Role of bioglass in enamel remineralization: Existing strategies and future prospects-A narrative review

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Jan;110(1):45-66. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34904. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

Abstract

Enamel, once formed, loses the ability to regenerate due to the loss of the formative ameloblasts. It is subjected to constant damaging events due to exposure to external agents and oral microbiomes. An enamel remineralization process targets to replenish the lost ionic component of the enamel through a multitude of methods. Enamel remineralization is highly challenging as it has a complex organized hierarchical microstructure. Hydroxyapatite nanocrystals of the enamel vary in size and orientation along alignment planes inside the enamel rod. The inability of the enamel to remodel unlike other mineralized tissues is another substantial deterrent. One of the well-known biomaterials, bioglass (BG) induces apatite formation on the external surface of the enamel in the presence of saliva or other physiological fluids. Calcium, sodium, phosphate, and silicate ions in BG become responsive in the presence of body fluids, leading to the precipitation of calcium phosphate. Studies have also demonstrated the bactericidal potential of BG against Streptococcus mutans biofilms. The anticariogenicity and antibacterial activity were found to be enhanced when BG was doped with inorganic ions such as F, Ag, Mg, Sr, and Zn. Due to the versatility of BG, it has been combined with a variety of agents such as chitosan, triclosan, and amelogenin to biomimic remineralization process. Key strategies that can aid in the development of contemporary enamel remineralization agents are also included in this review.

Keywords: bioglass; enamel; remineralization.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Ceramics* / pharmacology
  • Durapatite / pharmacology
  • Streptococcus mutans
  • Tooth Remineralization* / methods

Substances

  • Bioglass
  • Durapatite