Domestic laundry and microfiber pollution: Exploring fiber shedding from consumer apparel textiles

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0250346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250346. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Synthetic fibers are increasingly seen to dominate microplastic pollution profiles in aquatic environments, with evidence pointing to textiles as a potentially important source. However, the loss of microfibers from textiles during laundry is poorly understood. We evaluated microfiber release from a variety of synthetic and natural consumer apparel textile samples (n = 37), with different material types, constructions, and treatments during five consecutive domestic laundry cycles. Microfiber loss ranged from 9.6 mg to 1,240 mg kg-1 of textile per wash, or an estimated 8,809 to > 6,877,000 microfibers. Mechanically-treated polyester samples, dominated by fleeces and jerseys, released six times more microfibers (161 ± 173 mg kg-1 per wash) than did nylon samples with woven construction and filamentous yarns (27 ± 14 mg kg-1 per wash). Fiber shedding was positively correlated with fabric thickness for nylon and polyester. Interestingly, cotton and wool textiles also shed large amounts of microfibers (165 ± 44 mg kg-1 per wash). The similarity between the average width of textile fibers here (12.4 ± 4.5 μm) and those found in ocean samples provides support for the notion that home laundry is an important source of microfiber pollution. Evaluation of two marketed laundry lint traps provided insight into intervention options for the home, with retention of up to 90% for polyester fibers and 46% for nylon fibers. Our observation of a > 850-fold difference in the number of microfibers lost between low and high shedding textiles illustrates the strong potential for intervention, including more sustainable clothing design.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Laundering*
  • Microplastics
  • Plastics
  • Textiles / analysis*
  • Wastewater / chemistry

Substances

  • Microplastics
  • Plastics
  • Waste Water

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.14675760.v4

Grants and funding

Staff at MEC, Arc’teryx, REI and Patagonia played role in providing technical advice pertaining to designing the study and by providing sample materials for this research. These funders did not contribute to writing and did not review the manuscript prior to submission. The funders (MEC, REI, Arc’teryx, Patagonia) provided support in the form of resources and salaries for authors [KV, MV], and study design, but did not have additional role in data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.” www.rei.comwww.patagonia.comwww.arcteryx.comwww.metrovancouver.orgwww.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change.html]. The Sustainable Apparel Coalition is not a commercial enterprise, but rather a member-supported non profit association aimed at encouraging sustainability in the textile sector. Further clarification: Sustainable Apparel Coalition did not fund the study nor had any involvement. It is the present place of employment for the co-author, Joel Mertens, who at the time of this study was a staff member at MEC.