Retrospective comparison of conservative treatment and surgery for widely displaced olecranon fractures in low-demanding geriatric patients

Peter Kaiser; Kerstin Stock; Stefan Benedikt; Tobias Kastenberger; Gernot Schmidle; Rohit Arora

doi:10.1007/s00402-021-04031-7

Retrospective comparison of conservative treatment and surgery for widely displaced olecranon fractures in low-demanding geriatric patients

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2659-2667. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04031-7. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

Authors

Peter Kaiser¹, Kerstin Stock¹, Stefan Benedikt¹, Tobias Kastenberger¹, Gernot Schmidle¹, Rohit Arora²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
² Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. rohit.arora@i-med.ac.at.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of the clinical outcome of elderly patients who were treated surgically or conservatively for a displaced olecranon fracture (Mayo type IIA or IIB).

Patients and methods: Patients above the age of 70 years who were treated surgically (n = 11) for a displaced Mayo type IIA and IIB olecranon fracture between July 2015 and February 2019 were retrospectively compared with patients who were treated conservatively (n = 6). The range of motion, elbow strength, grip strength, VAS, DASH, OES, MEPI and Broberg and Morrey scores were evaluated.

Results: The conservative group showed a non-union with a persistent fracture gap of 17 mm (SD 12 mm) at the articular rim and 31 mm (15 mm) at the dorsal rim while there was no case of non-union in the surgical group. The arch of motion was 120° in the conservative group and 136° in the surgical group. There was no obvious difference in elbow extension strength in comparison to the healthy contralateral side (p = 0.20; 88% group I/87% group II). There was no difference in the OES (p = 0.30; 42 (SD 7) vs. 45 (SD 5)) and MEPI score (p = 0.46; (SD 8) vs. 96 (SD 19)). The conservative group presented a slightly worse DASH [p = 0.10; 26 (SD 25) vs 7 (SD 14)] and a significantly worse Broberg and Morrey score (p = 0.02; 84(SD 9) vs. 95 (SD 7)). The conservative group presented one complication (ulnar nerve palsy), while the surgical group presented two cases (prolonged lymphedema; blocked forearm rotation due to screw length with consecutive revision surgery).

Conclusion: Widely displaced olecranon fractures can successfully be treated conservatively in low-demanding geriatric patients with a satisfactory outcome. Patient selection is essential as patients that are more active might benefit from surgical treatment. Yet, treatment risks and benefits need to be balanced carefully in regard to the patient`s demands and requests.

Keywords: Conservative; Elderly; Fracture; Geriatric; Mayo; Olecranon; Surgery; Treatment.

MeSH terms

Aged
Conservative Treatment
Elbow Joint* / surgery
Fracture Fixation, Internal / adverse effects
Fractures, Bone* / etiology
Humans
Olecranon Process* / surgery
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ulna Fractures* / surgery