Integrative Structural Biology in the Era of Accurate Structure Prediction

J Mol Biol. 2021 Oct 1;433(20):167127. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167127. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

Abstract

Characterizing the three-dimensional structure of macromolecules is central to understanding their function. Traditionally, structures of proteins and their complexes have been determined using experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography, NMR, or cryo-electron microscopy-applied individually or in an integrative manner. Meanwhile, however, computational methods for protein structure prediction have been improving their accuracy, gradually, then suddenly, with the breakthrough advance by AlphaFold2, whose models of monomeric proteins are often as accurate as experimental structures. This breakthrough foreshadows a new era of computational methods that can build accurate models for most monomeric proteins. Here, we envision how such accurate modeling methods can combine with experimental structural biology techniques, enhancing integrative structural biology. We highlight the challenges that arise when considering multiple structural conformations, protein complexes, and polymorphic assemblies. These challenges will motivate further developments, both in modeling programs and in methods to solve experimental structures, towards better and quicker investigation of structure-function relationships.

Keywords: AlphaFold2; NMR; X-ray crystallography; cryo-electron microscopy; protein conformations; protein structure prediction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Crystallography, X-Ray / methods
  • Humans
  • Models, Molecular
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular / methods
  • Protein Conformation
  • Proteins / chemistry*

Substances

  • Proteins