Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles

F S Rep. 2020 Dec 9;2(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles.

Design: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patients: None.

Interventions: Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs.

Main outcome measures: Cost per live birth.

Results: In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations.

Conclusions: PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs.

Keywords: Oocyte donor; cost effective; preimplantation genetic testing.