Determinants of crop residue burning practice in the Terai region of Nepal

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253939. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The open burning of agricultural crop residue is a key environmental issue facing the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, the Indo-Gangetic plain in particular. There is a varying intensity in the incidence of open agricultural burning in this region, and multiple drivers that determine why farmers in this region decide to burn their crop residues. While there have been research studies conducted for other countries in the region, research into the determinants of crop-burning in the Nepalese context is missing. Using primary data from a survey of 388 farming households across three districts of the Nepal Terai-Nawalparasi, Rupandehi and Kapilvastu-applying a recursive bivariate probit model, this study seeks to find out what drives the Nepalese farmers to burn their crop residue instead of using them in a sustainable manner and suggest policy recommendations for mitigation. Our findings show that the major determining factors that influence the farmers' behavior in Nepal are livestock ownership, combine harvester use and awareness level of the farmers. While the effects of crop residue burning is transboundary in nature, the mitigation measures require to be region specific. Based on the findings, the study proposes raising livestock, using technology like Happy Seeders or upgrade the combine harvesters, raising awareness and changing perception of farmers, and promoting alternative uses of crop residue as viable mitigation measures.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture / trends*
  • Air Pollution / prevention & control*
  • Animals
  • Crops, Agricultural
  • Environmental Monitoring*
  • Farmers
  • Farms
  • Humans
  • Livestock
  • Nepal

Grants and funding

The study was conducted with the financial support from Swedish International Development Corporation (SIDA) and the Government of Norway. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of manuscript.