Background: There are scant data on the dimensional compatibility of cricothyroidotomy equipment and related airway anatomy. We compared the dimensional design of devices for cricothyroidotomy with anatomical airway data for adult patients.
Methods: For all available cricothyroidotomy equipment the outer diameter was recorded from manufacturer information or, if not available, measured using a sliding calliper. Outer diameters were compared with recently published mean (standard deviation [sd]) values for the height of the cricothyroid membrane obtained from computed tomography, separately for males (7.9 [2.2] mm) and for females (5.9 [1.7] mm).
Results: Twenty-one cricothyroidotomy sets (10 uncuffed, 11 cuffed) with 15 differently designed devices were included. Inner diameters of the tubes ranged from 3.5 to 6.0 mm and outer diameters from 5.0 to 11.7 mm. The outer diameter of the 15 different tubes was found to be greater than the mean membrane height of the adult male cricothyroid membrane in eight devices and greater than the mean membrane height for female adults in 10 devices. Considering the lower range of cricothyroid membrane height, 12 tube outer diameters would be too large for male adults and all 15 for female adults in this range.
Conclusion: The outer diameter of many devices currently marketed for cricothyroidotomy are oversized for adult airway anatomy, particularly for females. For emergency front-of-neck access through the cricothyroid membrane, anatomical data suggest that cricothyroidotomy devices with outer tube diameters of <7 mm for male and <6 mm for female adult patients should be preferred.
Keywords: airway; anatomy; compatibility; cricothyroidotomy; front of neck access.
Copyright © 2021 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.