Extent of resection and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) owes an ominous prognosis: its mean overall survival is 14 months. The extent of surgical resection (ESR) highlights among factors in which an association has been found to a somewhat better prognosis. However, the association between greater ESR and prolonged overall (OS) survival is not a constant finding nor a proven cause-and-effect phenomenon. To our objective is to establish the strength of association between ESR and OS in patients with GBM through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA-P recommendations, we conducted a systematic literature search; we included studies with adult patients who had undergone craniotomy for GBM. Our primary outcome is overall postoperative survival at 12 and 24 months. We reviewed 180 studies, excluded 158, and eliminated 8; 14 studies that suited our requirements were analyzed.

Results: The initial level of evidence of all studies is low, and it may be degraded to very low according to GRADE criteria because of design issues. The definition of different levels of the extent of resection is heterogeneous and poorly defined. We found a great amount of variation in the methodology of the operation and the adjuvant treatment protocol. The combined result for relative risk (RR) for OS for 12 months analysis is 1.25 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.14-1.36, P < .01], absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 15.7% (95% CI 11.9-19.4), relative risk reduction (RRR) of 0.24 (95% CI 0.18-0.31), number needed to treat (NNT) 6; for 24-month analysis RR is 1.59 (95% CI 1.11-2.26, P < .01) ARR of 11.5% (95% CI 7.7-15.1), relative risk reduction (RRR) of 0.53 (95% CI 0.33-0.76), (NNT) 9. In each term analysis, the proportion of alive patients who underwent more extensive resection is significantly higher than those who underwent subtotal resection.

Conclusion: Our results sustain a weak but statistically significant association between the ESR and OS in patients with GBM obtained from observational studies with a very low level of evidence according to GRADE criteria. As a consequence, any estimate of effect is very uncertain. Current information cannot sustain a cause-and-effect relationship between these variables.