An Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Way, Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Cefradine Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Dec;10(12):1478-1484. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.991. Epub 2021 Jun 20.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether test cefradine capsules and reference cefradine capsules were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese volunteers. An open-label, randomized, biperiodic, crossover design was used. In each of the 2 study periods (separated by a 1-week washout period), 250-mg single doses of either the test or reference cefradine capsule were administered to study participants under fasted and fed conditions. Blood samples were collected at intervals from predose to 8 hours afterward. In the fasting study, the 90% confidence intervals (90%CI) of the Cmax , AUC0-8h , and AUC0-∞ for the test and reference preparations were 93.7%-112.2%, 94.6%-100.8%, and 94.7%-100.9%, respectively. In the fed study, the 90%CI of the Cmax , AUC0-8h , and AUC0-∞ for the test and reference preparations was 81.0%-99.1%, 100.5%-106.3%, and 100.5%-105.9%, respectively. The results showed that the test cefradine capsules and the reference formulation are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions.

Keywords: bioequivalent; cefradine capsules; cephalosporin antibiotic; pharmacokinetics; safety.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Capsules
  • Cephradine*
  • China
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Humans
  • Therapeutic Equivalency

Substances

  • Capsules
  • Cephradine