The price penalty for red meat substitutes in popular dishes and the diversity in substitution

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0252675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252675. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Life cycle assessments (LCA) often highlight the environmental and health benefits for consumers if western diets substitute red meat. However, the specific trade-off consumer face when asked to substitute a red meat dish is scarcely researched, often neglecting the bouquet of substitution options and/or the price component involved. Four substitution strategies are evaluated within an individually adapted choice based conjoint: the substitution by (1) the same red meat dishes with a halved meat portion size, (2) novel plant-based products that mimic the functionality and taste, (3) authentic plant-based components that just mimic the functionality, and (4) vegetarian dishes that just neglect the meat component if still familiar to consumers. The analysis is executed for three popular red meat dishes to account for consistency across meal scenarios, namely Meatballs, Spaghetti Bolognese and Sausage Buns. The analysis is sensitive to red meat consumption habits to better understand the preferences of consumers that can actually substitute a red meat intake.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Choice Behavior / physiology*
  • Consumer Behavior / economics
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Feeding Behavior
  • Food Preferences / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Internet
  • Red Meat / economics*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / economics
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / statistics & numerical data
  • Taste*

Grants and funding

D.L. - The article is fully financed by the DFG project „Key food choices and climate change“, project no. 431972934 (German Research Association, https://www.dfg.de/en/index.jsp). The DFG had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.