Reply to: Clusters of flowstone ages are not supported by statistical evidence
Nature
.
2021 Jun;594(7863):E11.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03587-z.
Authors
Robyn Pickering
1
2
,
Andy I R Herries
3
4
,
Jon D Woodhead
5
,
John C Hellstrom
5
,
Helen E Green
5
,
Bence Paul
5
,
Terrence Ritzman
6
7
8
,
David S Strait
4
8
,
Benjamin J Schoville
6
9
,
John Hancox
10
Affiliations
1
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. robyn.pickering@uct.ac.za.
2
Human Evolution Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. robyn.pickering@uct.ac.za.
3
The Australian Archaeomagnetism Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
4
Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
5
School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
6
Human Evolution Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
7
Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
8
Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
9
School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
10
Evolutionary Science Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
PMID:
34135517
DOI:
10.1038/s41586-021-03587-z
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Animals
Hominidae*
Radiometric Dating