SARS-CoV-2 NSP12 Protein Is Not an Interferon-β Antagonist

J Virol. 2021 Aug 10;95(17):e0074721. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00747-21. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is bringing an unprecedented health crisis to the world. To date, our understanding of the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host innate immunity is still limited. Previous studies reported that SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 12 (NSP12) was able to suppress interferon-β (IFN-β) activation in IFN-β promoter luciferase reporter assays, which provided insights into the pathogenesis of COVID-19. In this study, we demonstrated that IFN-β promoter-mediated luciferase activity was reduced during coexpression of NSP12. However, we could show NSP12 did not affect IRF3 or NF-κB activation. Moreover, IFN-β production induced by Sendai virus (SeV) infection or other stimulus was not affected by NSP12 at mRNA or protein level. Additionally, the type I IFN signaling pathway was not affected by NSP12, as demonstrated by the expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Further experiments revealed that different experiment systems, including protein tags and plasmid backbones, could affect the readouts of IFN-β promoter luciferase assays. In conclusion, unlike as previously reported, our study showed SARS-CoV-2 NSP12 protein is not an IFN-β antagonist. It also rings the alarm on the general usage of luciferase reporter assays in studying SARS-CoV-2. IMPORTANCE Previous studies investigated the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins and interferon signaling and proposed that several SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins, including NSP12, could suppress IFN-β activation. However, most of these results were generated from IFN-β promoter luciferase reporter assay and have not been validated functionally. In our study, we found that, although NSP12 could suppress IFN-β promoter luciferase activity, it showed no inhibitory effect on IFN-β production or its downstream signaling. Further study revealed that contradictory results could be generated from different experiment systems. On one hand, we demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 NSP12 could not suppress IFN-β signaling. On the other hand, our study suggests that caution needs to be taken with the interpretation of SARS-CoV-2-related luciferase assays.

Keywords: IFN-β; IFN-β promoter luciferase activity assay; NSP12; SARS-CoV-2; interferon-β; nonstructural protein 12; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase* / genetics
  • Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase* / metabolism
  • HEK293 Cells
  • Humans
  • Interferon Regulatory Factor-3 / genetics
  • Interferon Regulatory Factor-3 / metabolism
  • Interferon-beta* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Interferon-beta* / biosynthesis
  • Interferon-beta* / genetics
  • NF-kappa B / genetics
  • NF-kappa B / metabolism
  • Promoter Regions, Genetic*
  • RNA, Messenger / biosynthesis
  • RNA, Messenger / genetics
  • SARS-CoV-2* / genetics
  • SARS-CoV-2* / metabolism

Substances

  • IRF3 protein, human
  • Interferon Regulatory Factor-3
  • NF-kappa B
  • RNA, Messenger
  • Interferon-beta
  • Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase
  • NSP12 protein, SARS-CoV-2