A New Approach of Sperm Motility Subpopulation Structure in Donkey and Horse

Sabrina Gacem; Anthony Valverde; Jaime Catalán; Iván Yánez Ortiz; Carles Soler; Jordi Miró

doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.651477

A New Approach of Sperm Motility Subpopulation Structure in Donkey and Horse

Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 25:8:651477. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.651477. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Sabrina Gacem¹, Anthony Valverde², Jaime Catalán¹, Iván Yánez Ortiz¹, Carles Soler³, Jordi Miró¹

Affiliations

¹ Equine Reproduction Service, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery Veterinary Faculty, Catalonia, Spain.
² Costa Rica Institute of Technology, School of Agronomy, Alajuela, Costa Rica.
³ Universitat de València, Departamento de Biología Celular, Biología Funcional y Antropología Física, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain.

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the sperm kinematic values with high frames per second, to define the subpopulation structure of a horse and a donkey and compare them. A total of 57 fresh semen ejaculates (26 Spanish and 16 Arabian horse breeds and 10 donkeys) were collected and subsequently analyzed for kinematic parameters using the Computer-aided sperm motility analysis ISAS®v1.2 system and using a Spermtrack® 10-μm depth counting chamber. Sequences were recorded at 250 frames per second, and eight kinematic parameters were automatically evaluated. All kinematic parameters showed significant differences between a donkey and a horse and between horse breeds. All ejaculates evaluated showed excellent semen motility characteristics, with significantly higher values for all kinematic parameters for donkeys compared with horses except for beat-cross frequency. Donkey sperm was faster and linear than the horse. Regarding horse breeds differences, the Spanish horse had higher average path velocity, curvilinear velocity, and beat-cross frequency compared with the Arabian horse. Spanish horse sperm was rapid, but Arab horse was more linear. The principal component analysis showed three sperm subpopulations in the ejaculate of donkeys and horses with a significantly different motility characteristic between them. The dominant subpopulation for both donkey and horse was for rapid, straight, and linear with a high beat sperm (38.2 and 41.7%, respectively), whereas the lowest subpopulation was for the slowest and non-linear sperms. This, plus slight differences in the distribution of these subpopulations between Arabian and Spanish horses, were found. In conclusion, higher frames permitted to have a new interpretation of motile subpopulations with species and breed differences. More so, future works on donkey and horse breed spermatozoa should take into account differences between breeds that may interfere and alter the real analysis performed.

Keywords: CASA-mot; equids; sperm kinematics; sperm motility; subpopulations.