On anesthesia and race

J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;113(5):541-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Abstract

Racial tensions continue to ignite social unrest in the United States. Structural racism is increasingly recognized as a public health issue. It is therefore necessary to continue addressing the interaction of race and medicine, including anesthesiology. While many may overlook the impact that racial discrimination has had on the development of anesthesiology, understanding pain through a racialized lens has always been entwined with this medical specialty since its origins. Considering the first public demonstration of ether anesthesia in 1846 occurred 15 years before the American Civil War (1861-1865), it is naïve to pretend that anesthesia has been insulated from racial prejudice. We increasingly recognize the effects of variables, such as housing and education, which are important as social determinants of health. Across ethnic and racial lines, statistically significant differences persist in pain assessment and analgesia delivery. To understand these irregularities without relying on unsupported theories, we must challenge our current understanding of race in medicine. By reviewing the history of anesthesia through a racialized lens, we may better explore our biases and develop strategies towards racially equitable care. This article focuses on anesthesia's roots on the plantation in the American South, the medical perpetuation of racial disparities, and the challenges we face in healthcare today.

Keywords: Anesthesia; Disparities; History; Race; Slavery.

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia*
  • Anesthesiology*
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Ethnicity
  • Healthcare Disparities
  • Humans
  • Racism*
  • United States